H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jaime Oncins vs Bryan Shelton H2H: 0-1
Bryan Shelton holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bryan Shelton leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bryan Shelton won the 1994 Mexico City third round 3-6 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1994* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Bryan Shelton | 3-6 6-2 7-6(2) | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bryan Shelton | #1,195 | #55 | 253 | 1,725 | 101 | 136 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Bryan Shelton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #123 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #97 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #85 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,532 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #190 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #283 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |