H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jaime Oncins vs Dan Cassidy H2H: 0-1
Dan Cassidy holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dan Cassidy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dan Cassidy won the 1988 Sao Paulo fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1988* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Dan Cassidy | 6-4 6-3 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dan Cassidy | #753 | #74 | 187 | 1,629 | 35 | 75 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,402 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |