Jaime Oncins
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 26, 1995 | H2H |
| Renzo Furlan | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 4, 1994 | H2H |
| Tomas Carbonell | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Nov 15, 1992 | H2H |
| Bernd Karbacher | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 23, 1997 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Jaime Oncins holds a 1–0 lead over Jordi Burillo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Oncins leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1993 Sao Paulo round of 32 6-7(4) 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-1 | Jordi Burillo | Match data | Nov 4, 1993* | R32 | Sao Paulo | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,810 | 64 | 87 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jordi Burillo | #1,377 | #43 | 887 | 1,728 | 91 | 129 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Jordi Burillo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #497 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #157 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #56 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–30 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #90 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #148 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,491 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,439 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,451 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,438 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Jordi Burillo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1990 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1993 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1991 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1992 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 32 | 42 | 74 | 43.2% | 30 | 39 | 69 | 43.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | 15 | 39 | 54 | 27.8% | 70 | 79 | 149 | 47.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 125/142 of Jaime Oncins's and 189/219 of Jordi Burillo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Jordi Burillo | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9/9 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 51.4% | 67.0% | 52.4% | 52.5% | 30.2% | 59.6% | 33.7% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 30/35 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 51.1% | 71.7% | 47.0% | 49.4% | 47.1% | 59.7% | 43.1% |
| 21 | 1991 | 35/39 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 55.4% | 69.9% | 50.1% | 49.9% | 43.4% | 61.0% | 41.7% | 1994 | 44/50 | 5.6 | 4.4 | 50.5% | 71.4% | 44.6% | 54.8% | 47.8% | 57.9% | 39.0% |
| 22 | 1992 | 42/46 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 55.5% | 69.7% | 45.7% | 54.9% | 43.5% | 59.3% | 42.8% | 1995 | 34/40 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 51.8% | 72.1% | 47.8% | 51.7% | 49.1% | 60.6% | 40.1% |
| 23 | 1993 | 29/34 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 58.2% | 66.6% | 40.7% | 51.5% | 42.1% | 55.8% | 40.6% | 1996 | 32/35 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 55.6% | 66.0% | 48.0% | 51.1% | 51.1% | 57.8% | 37.2% |
| 24 | 1994 | 6/8 | 2.2 | 9.0 | 57.5% | 65.4% | 40.9% | 63.4% | 41.9% | 55.0% | 39.7% | 1997 | 14/18 | 7.1 | 3.6 | 50.9% | 72.1% | 45.8% | 56.0% | 39.3% | 58.9% | 38.4% |
| 25 | 1995 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 60.8% | 70.0% | 43.9% | 63.0% | 24.5% | 59.4% | 39.6% | 1998 | 26/32 | 7.4 | 3.1 | 55.7% | 74.8% | 46.1% | 53.8% | 40.5% | 62.5% | 35.8% |
| 26 | 1996 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 18.5 | 45.0% | 69.3% | 28.9% | 47.3% | 28.6% | 47.0% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 6/6 | 3.0 | 9.7 | 51.8% | 67.9% | 35.1% | 48.8% | 61.9% | 52.0% | 35.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 1/3 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 57.7% | 66.7% | 31.8% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 51.9% | 35.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 56.5% | 63.9% | 46.8% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 56.5% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 125/151 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 56.0% | 68.7% | 44.6% | 52.8% | 43.3% | 58.1% | 41.3% | — | 189/220 | 5.8 | 3.8 | 52.5% | 71.0% | 46.8% | 52.6% | 46.0% | 59.5% | 38.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Jordi Burillo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1487 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 |
| 18 | 1988 | 1493 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.86 | 0–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 1471 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.19 | 1992 | 1485 | 124.2 | +0.65 | -2.93 | 0.834 | 46.6% | — | +45 | — | 31.8% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.7 | -0.58 |
| 20 | 1990 | 1442 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.15 | 1993 | 1611 | 133.5 | -1.28 | +2.37 | 1.069 | 51.2% | -106 | +63 | — | 51.3% | +0.01 | 4–6 (40%) | 5–8 (38%) | 98.4 | -0.09 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1677 | 121.5 | +0.13 | +1.64 | 1.068 | 51.1% | -83 | -50 | -66 | 55.6% | +0.24 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–4 (56%) | 98.5 | +1.89 | 1994 | 1586 | 128.5 | -1.91 | -0.14 | 0.927 | 48.5% | -89 | +49 | +49 | 42.1% | -0.58 | 4–8 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | 98.8 | +0.41 |
| 22 | 1992 | 1778 | 131.6 | -1.02 | +2.52 | 1.052 | 50.9% | -123 | +21 | — | 58.1% | +0.28 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.8 | +1.08 | 1995 | 1625 | 133.5 | +0.07 | +0.28 | 1.018 | 50.1% | -144 | +92 | -12 | 46.6% | -0.04 | 8–12 (40%) | 7–11 (39%) | 98.6 | +1.27 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1584 | 130.7 | -3.35 | +1.16 | 0.920 | 48.2% | +18 | +63 | — | 39.3% | -0.56 | 5–11 (31%) | 2–9 (18%) | 89.5 | -0.21 | 1996 | 1585 | 134.5 | -2.30 | -0.37 | 0.881 | 47.8% | -120 | +113 | — | 42.5% | -0.41 | 8–6 (57%) | 3–5 (38%) | 103.5 | -1.41 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1506 | 104.0 | -2.79 | -0.18 | 0.883 | 47.5% | +74 | +44 | — | 36.4% | -0.86 | 0–6 (0%) | 0–2 | — | +0.29 | 1997 | 1598 | 128.1 | -0.43 | -1.19 | 0.935 | 48.7% | — | +108 | — | 48.8% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–4 (33%) | 96.3 | +1.03 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1509 | 108.4 | +0.94 | -0.26 | 0.977 | 49.5% | — | +44 | — | 33.3% | -0.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 1998 | 1567 | 127.8 | -0.01 | -1.70 | 0.957 | 48.9% | -88 | +96 | +55 | 40.3% | -0.60 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–5 (38%) | 98.6 | -0.25 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1491 | 108.9 | +1.07 | +2.59 | 0.821 | 45.2% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -2.14 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 1439 | 112.1 | -3.40 | -1.77 | 0.729 | 43.8% | +88 | +85 | — | 13.3% | -1.93 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 1451 | 107.4 | -1.60 | -1.30 | 0.730 | 43.1% | +85 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 1438 | 100.2 | +0.01 | -0.73 | 0.903 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1810 | 127.5 | -1.35 | +1.50 | 0.987 | 49.6% | -49 | +28 | -66 | 47.0% | -0.28 | 17–39 (30%) | 23–23 (50%) | 90.4 | +1.95 | — | 1729 | 136.7 | -1.03 | -0.13 | 0.957 | 49.1% | -106 | +81 | +37 | 44.2% | -0.36 | 30–45 (40%) | 28–40 (41%) | 97.1 | +0.21 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 26, 1995 | H2H |
| Renzo Furlan | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 4, 1994 | H2H |
| Tomas Carbonell | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Nov 15, 1992 | H2H |
| Bernd Karbacher | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | 4 | 4 | 8 | Nov 7, 1997 | H2H |
| Albert Costa | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 9, 1998 | H2H |
| Richard Fromberg | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Sergi Bruguera | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 17, 1998 | H2H |
| Gilbert Schaller | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 11, 1996 | H2H |