Jaime Oncins
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 26, 1995 | H2H |
| Renzo Furlan | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 4, 1994 | H2H |
| Tomas Carbonell | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Nov 15, 1992 | H2H |
| Bernd Karbacher | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 23, 1997 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Jaime Oncins holds a 2–0 lead over Marian Vajda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Oncins leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1993 Hamburg Open round of 64 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | Marian Vajda | Match data | May 5, 1993* | R64 | Hamburg Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Jaime Oncins | 6-2 6-2 | Marian Vajda | Match data | May 24, 1991* | R16 | Bologna | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,810 | 64 | 87 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marian Vajda | #1,076 | #34 | 556 | 1,784 | 120 | 150 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Marian Vajda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #52 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #72 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #123 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #83 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,491 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #97 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,439 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,492 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,451 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,473 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,447 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,438 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Marian Vajda | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1988 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 22 | 1992 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 23 | 9 | 32 | 71.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1993 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 24 | 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1997 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1998 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 32 | 42 | 74 | 43.2% | 30 | 39 | 69 | 43.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | 17 | 38 | 55 | 30.9% | 94 | 85 | 179 | 52.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 24 | 32 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 125/142 of Jaime Oncins's and 50/56 of Marian Vajda's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Marian Vajda | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 1991 | 35/39 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 55.4% | 69.9% | 50.1% | 49.9% | 43.4% | 61.0% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 42/46 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 55.5% | 69.7% | 45.7% | 54.9% | 43.5% | 59.3% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 29/34 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 58.2% | 66.6% | 40.7% | 51.5% | 42.1% | 55.8% | 40.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 6/8 | 2.2 | 9.0 | 57.5% | 65.4% | 40.9% | 63.4% | 41.9% | 55.0% | 39.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 60.8% | 70.0% | 43.9% | 63.0% | 24.5% | 59.4% | 39.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 18.5 | 45.0% | 69.3% | 28.9% | 47.3% | 28.6% | 47.0% | 43.5% | 1991 | 40/44 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 54.0% | 62.5% | 48.0% | 51.1% | 46.1% | 55.5% | 40.8% |
| 27 | 1997 | 6/6 | 3.0 | 9.7 | 51.8% | 67.9% | 35.1% | 48.8% | 61.9% | 52.0% | 35.0% | 1992 | 7/8 | 2.9 | 5.3 | 53.0% | 61.2% | 47.1% | 55.6% | 35.9% | 54.5% | 37.8% |
| 28 | 1998 | 1/3 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 57.7% | 66.7% | 31.8% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 51.9% | 35.1% | 1993 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 56.0% | 53.5% | 39.8% | 40.3% | 33.3% | 46.8% | 38.9% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1/2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 47.3% | 42.3% | 41.4% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 41.8% | 40.4% |
| 31 | 2001 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 56.5% | 63.9% | 46.8% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 56.5% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 125/151 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 56.0% | 68.7% | 44.6% | 52.8% | 43.3% | 58.1% | 41.3% | — | 50/270 | 2.5 | 4.1 | 53.8% | 61.6% | 47.4% | 51.3% | 44.6% | 54.8% | 40.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Marian Vajda | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1988 | 1493 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.86 | 0–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 1471 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.19 | 1984 | 1488 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | 46.2% | -0.39 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 20 | 1990 | 1442 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.15 | 1985 | 1607 | 129.0 | — | — | — | — | -102 | +82 | — | 45.5% | -0.45 | 9–2 (82%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | -0.17 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1677 | 121.5 | +0.13 | +1.64 | 1.068 | 51.1% | -83 | -50 | -66 | 55.6% | +0.24 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +1.89 | 1986 | 1596 | 129.9 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +67 | — | 43.8% | -0.43 | 8–6 (57%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +0.61 |
| 22 | 1992 | 1778 | 131.6 | -1.02 | +2.52 | 1.052 | 50.9% | -123 | +21 | — | 58.1% | +0.28 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | — | +1.08 | 1987 | 1704 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -226 | +119 | — | 49.0% | -0.05 | 11–2 (85%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +0.10 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1584 | 130.7 | -3.35 | +1.16 | 0.920 | 48.2% | +18 | +63 | — | 39.3% | -0.56 | 5–11 (31%) | 2–9 (18%) | — | -0.21 | 1988 | 1682 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -214 | +153 | — | 46.9% | -0.23 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -2.69 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1506 | 104.0 | -2.79 | -0.18 | 0.883 | 47.5% | +74 | +44 | — | 36.4% | -0.86 | 0–6 (0%) | 0–2 | — | +0.29 | 1989 | 1628 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | -176 | +109 | — | 45.9% | -0.39 | 7–7 (50%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +0.49 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1509 | 108.4 | +0.94 | -0.26 | 0.977 | 49.5% | — | +44 | — | 33.3% | -0.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 1990 | 1672 | 133.7 | — | — | — | — | -198 | +69 | — | 47.1% | -0.03 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +0.05 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1491 | 108.9 | +1.07 | +2.59 | 0.821 | 45.2% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -2.14 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.08 | 1991 | 1599 | 129.3 | -3.97 | +1.38 | 0.917 | 48.2% | -130 | +135 | — | 41.9% | -0.61 | 9–8 (53%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.67 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1439 | 112.1 | -3.40 | -1.77 | 0.729 | 43.8% | +88 | +85 | — | 13.3% | -1.93 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.45 | 1992 | 1492 | 96.2 | -2.53 | -0.84 | 0.831 | 46.5% | -63 | +135 | — | 24.0% | -1.56 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | +0.37 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1451 | 107.4 | -1.60 | -1.30 | 0.730 | 43.1% | +85 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.07 | 1993 | 1474 | 103.0 | -0.27 | -3.94 | 0.732 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.04 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1447 | 97.5 | -0.03 | -0.72 | 0.694 | 41.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1438 | 100.2 | +0.01 | -0.73 | 0.903 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1810 | 127.5 | -1.35 | +1.50 | 0.987 | 49.6% | -49 | +28 | -66 | 47.0% | -0.28 | 17–39 (30%) | 23–23 (50%) | 90.4 | +1.95 | — | 1785 | 134.8 | -3.54 | +0.81 | 0.890 | 47.6% | -135 | +106 | — | 44.4% | -0.40 | 53–46 (54%) | 37–38 (49%) | 105.3 | -0.59 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 26, 1995 | H2H |
| Renzo Furlan | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 4, 1994 | H2H |
| Tomas Carbonell | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Nov 15, 1992 | H2H |
| Bernd Karbacher | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 2 | 3 | 5 | Sep 27, 1991 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 2 | 3 | 5 | Sep 12, 1991 | H2H |
| Karel Novacek | 2 | 3 | 5 | Aug 2, 1991 | H2H |
| Franco Davin | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 15, 1993 | H2H |
| Wally Masur | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 15, 1992 | H2H |