H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jaime Oncins vs Marian Vajda H2H: 2-0
Jaime Oncins holds a 2–0 lead over Marian Vajda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Oncins leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1993 Hamburg Masters second round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 61
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1993* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jaime Oncins | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | Marian Vajda | Match data |
| May 24, 1991* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jaime Oncins | 6-2 6-2 | Marian Vajda | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marian Vajda | #1,076 | #34 | 556 | 1,784 | 120 | 149 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Marian Vajda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #52 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #72 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #123 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #83 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #97 | 1,598 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,503 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,456 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |