H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Jaime Oncins vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 1-1

Jaime Oncins and Martin Wostenholme are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Wostenholme won the 1989 Guaruja round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Oncins
BRA Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Martin Wostenholme
CAN Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Wostenholme #392 6-2 6-3 Jaime Oncins #314 Match data Feb 9, 1989* R32 Guaruja ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Oncins #326 7-6 7-6 Martin Wostenholme #265 Match data Nov 3, 1988* R32 Sao Paulo ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Oncins #1,034 #34 773 1,810 64 87 42.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Martin Wostenholme #1,171 #84 265 1,606 44 79 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Oncins Martin Wostenholme
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,497 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
18 1988 1–2 33.3% #314 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 0–2 0.0% #263 1,470 0 0 1982 2–1 66.7% — 1,519 0 0
20 1990 0–4 0.0% #113 1,442 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% #329 1,501 0 0
21 1991 22–17 56.4% #64 1,677 0 0 1984 2–3 40.0% #186 1,526 0 0
22 1992 27–19 58.7% #48 1,778 0 2 1985 4–8 33.3% #93 1,556 0 0
23 1993 11–23 32.4% #133 1,584 0 2 1986 9–18 33.3% #190 1,533 0 0
24 1994 1–7 12.5% #230 1,505 0 2 1987 2–7 22.2% #251 1,494 0 0
25 1995 1–2 33.3% #222 1,508 0 2 1988 3–4 42.9% #293 1,496 0 0
26 1996 0–2 0.0% #160 1,491 0 2 1989 6–8 42.9% #120 1,536 0 0
27 1997 0–6 0.0% #166 1,439 0 2 1990 10–19 34.5% #156 1,508 0 0
28 1998 1–2 33.3% #223 1,451 0 2 1991 6–7 46.2% #153 1,523 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #340 1,512 0 0
31 2001 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,438 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Oncins Martin Wostenholme
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
22 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — — — — — 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 7 15 22 31.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
25 1995 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 42 74 43.2% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — 16 33 49 32.7% 21 36 57 36.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 125/142 of Jaime Oncins's and 13/14 of Martin Wostenholme's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jaime Oncins Martin Wostenholme
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 35/39 3.2 2.6 55.4% 69.9% 50.1% 49.9% 43.4% 61.0% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 42/46 3.0 3.8 55.5% 69.7% 45.7% 54.9% 43.5% 59.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 29/34 2.9 4.4 58.2% 66.6% 40.7% 51.5% 42.1% 55.8% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 6/8 2.2 9.0 57.5% 65.4% 40.9% 63.4% 41.9% 55.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 3/3 3.0 5.3 60.8% 70.0% 43.9% 63.0% 24.5% 59.4% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1996 2/2 1.5 18.5 45.0% 69.3% 28.9% 47.3% 28.6% 47.0% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1997 6/6 3.0 9.7 51.8% 67.9% 35.1% 48.8% 61.9% 52.0% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1998 1/3 4.0 8.0 57.7% 66.7% 31.8% 33.3% 33.3% 51.9% 35.1% 1991 12/13 1.9 2.3 68.1% 64.5% 47.0% 50.5% 47.1% 58.8% 42.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 1/1 4.0 7.0 71.0% 63.6% 33.3% 60.0% 50.0% 54.8% 39.7%
31 2001 1/1 3.0 13.0 56.5% 63.9% 46.8% 60.0% 50.0% 56.5% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Oncins Martin Wostenholme
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1497 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1497 114.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.24
18 1988 1493 95.3 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.86 0–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1471 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19 1982 1520 101.6 — — — — +44 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–1 (67%) — — +0.70
20 1990 1442 102.8 — — — — +19 — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — -0.15 1983 1502 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.32
21 1991 1677 121.5 +0.13 +1.64 1.068 51.1% -83 -50 -66 55.6% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.89 1984 1526 113.6 — — — — — +54 — 33.3% -0.92 2–0 1–1 — -0.27
22 1992 1778 131.6 -1.02 +2.52 1.052 50.9% -123 +21 — 58.1% +0.28 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 105.8 +1.08 1985 1557 128.6 — — — — +23 -30 — 37.5% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 97.9 +0.06
23 1993 1584 130.7 -3.35 +1.16 0.920 48.2% +18 +63 — 39.3% -0.56 5–11 (31%) 2–9 (18%) 89.5 -0.21 1986 1533 126.0 — — — — -21 +67 +22 36.8% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 1–6 (14%) 96.3 +0.42
24 1994 1506 104.0 -2.79 -0.18 0.883 47.5% +74 +44 — 36.4% -0.86 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.29 1987 1495 96.0 — — — — -29 +77 — 22.2% -2.28 — 0–1 — -0.08
25 1995 1509 108.4 +0.94 -0.26 0.977 49.5% — +44 — 33.3% -0.50 — — — -0.02 1988 1497 107.0 — — — — -8 — — 38.5% -0.46 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.93
26 1996 1491 108.9 +1.07 +2.59 0.821 45.2% — — — 28.6% -2.14 0–1 1–1 — -0.08 1989 1537 120.9 — — — — -67 +62 — 45.2% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.37
27 1997 1439 112.1 -3.40 -1.77 0.729 43.8% +88 +85 — 13.3% -1.93 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 1990 1509 115.6 — — — — +21 +47 — 36.6% -1.13 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 98.1 +1.22
28 1998 1451 107.4 -1.60 -1.30 0.730 43.1% +85 — — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–1 — -0.07 1991 1523 103.7 -1.82 +1.47 1.033 50.4% -15 +33 +68 50.0% -0.30 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.29
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1512 102.2 -1.95 -1.09 0.880 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.01
31 2001 1438 100.2 +0.01 -0.73 0.903 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 127.5 -1.35 +1.50 0.987 49.6% -49 +28 -66 47.0% -0.28 17–39 (30%) 23–23 (50%) 90.4 +1.95 — 1607 122.6 -1.83 +1.27 1.020 50.3% +2 +55 +45 37.9% -0.89 14–22 (39%) 12–22 (35%) 94.8 +3.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.