H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jaime Oncins vs Patrick Baur H2H: 1-1
Jaime Oncins and Patrick Baur are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Oncins leads 1–0 on clay, while Patrick Baur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrick Baur won the 1997 US Open first round 4-6 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Patrick Baur | 4-6 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-3 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
| May 2, 1991* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaime Oncins | 6-3 6-1 | Patrick Baur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Patrick Baur | #571 | #74 | 476 | 1,697 | 67 | 107 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Patrick Baur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #178 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #192 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #82 | 1,494 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #130 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #257 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #180 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #264 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #380 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |