H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Oncins vs Roberto Azar H2H: 3-0
Jaime Oncins holds a 3–0 lead over Roberto Azar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Oncins leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1992 Sao Paulo third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1992* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Oncins | 6-1 6-4 | Roberto Azar | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1992* | Buzios | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jaime Oncins | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Roberto Azar | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1992* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Oncins | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Roberto Azar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Roberto Azar | #1,228 | #81 | 455 | 1,691 | 49 | 90 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Roberto Azar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #257 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #106 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #96 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #238 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |