H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Anders Jarryd H2H: 2-0
Jaime Yzaga holds a 2–0 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1991 Philadelphia second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1991* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Jaime Yzaga | 6-3 6-3 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| May 14, 1988* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 6-1 7-5 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Anders Jarryd | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 |