H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 0-2
Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 2–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1995 Hamburg Masters fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1995* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-3 6-1 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1994* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-3 6-1 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Andrea Gaudenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |