H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 1-1
Jaime Yzaga and Andrei Cherkasov are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on clay, while Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1994 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(14) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1994* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 7-6(14) 6-0 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Andrei Cherkasov | 7-5 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Andrei Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |