H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Claudio Mezzadri H2H: 1-1
Jaime Yzaga and Claudio Mezzadri are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Claudio Mezzadri won the 1992 Charlotte third round 6-3 1-6 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1992* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Claudio Mezzadri | 6-3 1-6 7-6(9) | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1992* | Tampa | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 5-7 6-4 7-6(5) | Claudio Mezzadri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Claudio Mezzadri | #1,238 | #26 | 539 | 1,795 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Claudio Mezzadri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #831 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #151 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #135 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #28 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #105 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #230 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #97 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #134 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |