H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Danilo Marcelino H2H: 1-1
Jaime Yzaga and Danilo Marcelino are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on carpet, while Danilo Marcelino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danilo Marcelino won the 1992 Buzios third round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1992* | Buzios | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Danilo Marcelino | 6-3 7-6(4) | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1990* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Jaime Yzaga | 6-4 3-6 7-6 | Danilo Marcelino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Danilo Marcelino | #1,268 | #91 | 404 | 1,574 | 29 | 55 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Danilo Marcelino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #256 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |