H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs David Pate H2H: 2-1
Jaime Yzaga holds a 2–1 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Pate won the 1988 Scottsdale third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1988* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Pate | 6-1 6-3 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-4 3-6 5-7 6-2 6-3 | David Pate | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-3 6-3 7-6 | David Pate | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | David Pate | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |