H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs David Rikl H2H: 0-1
David Rikl holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Rikl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1995 Santiago fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1995* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Rikl | 6-1 6-1 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |