H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jaime Yzaga vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 1-2

Fabrice Santoro holds a 2–1 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 1993 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Yzaga
PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 1993* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Fabrice Santoro #27 6-2 6-3 Jaime Yzaga #63 Match data
Oct 5, 1990* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Fabrice Santoro #85 6-2 6-2 Jaime Yzaga #78 Match data
Sep 28, 1989* Bordeaux ATP 250 R32 Clay Jaime Yzaga #29 6-4 7-6 Fabrice Santoro #309 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,870 238 205 53.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Yzaga Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,604 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,843 0 3 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,766 0 4 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1992 25–18 58.1% #49 1,687 0 6 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,779 0 8 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,726 0 8 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,613 0 8 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,608 0 8 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6