H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jaime Yzaga vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 1-2

Fabrice Santoro holds a 2–1 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 1993 Indian Wells Open round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Yzaga
PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fabrice Santoro #27 6-2 6-3 Jaime Yzaga #63 Match data Mar 6, 1993* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Fabrice Santoro #85 6-2 6-2 Jaime Yzaga #78 Match data Oct 5, 1990* R16 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Yzaga #29 6-4 7-6 Fabrice Santoro #309 Match data Sep 28, 1989* R32 Bordeaux ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,872 239 206 53.7% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,890 462 435 51.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Yzaga Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,603 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2 1992 28–23 54.9% #43 1,748 0 0
20 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,631 0 0
21 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,836 0 3 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,736 0 0
22 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,610 0 0
23 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,767 0 4 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,558 0 0
24 1992 26–19 57.8% #49 1,687 0 6 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,803 0 1
25 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,780 0 8 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,708 0 1
26 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,728 0 8 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,615 0 8 2000 34–27 55.7% #31 1,739 0 3
28 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,609 0 8 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,740 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 18–15 54.5% #52 1,815 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,781 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,701 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,788 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,757 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,696 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,689 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Yzaga Fabrice Santoro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1985 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1986 14 10 24 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1987 16 11 27 59.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
20 1988 13 11 24 54.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1990 5 9 14 35.7% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
24 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 9 6 15 60.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
25 1993 17 12 29 58.6% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 14 15 29 48.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
26 1994 12 12 24 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
27 1995 7 9 16 43.8% 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 22 16 38 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1996 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 20 15 35 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 22 14 36 61.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 13 11 24 54.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 13 22 40.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 134 106 240 55.8% 82 73 155 52.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 18 20 38 47.4% — 246 213 459 53.6% 128 136 264 48.5% 44 33 77 57.1% 44 53 97 45.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/233 of Jaime Yzaga's and 766/857 of Fabrice Santoro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jaime Yzaga Fabrice Santoro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 43/47 1.3 2.4 59.8% 64.2% 47.7% 57.1% 45.6% 57.5% 43.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 41/51 1.9 3.2 58.7% 63.0% 51.9% 51.4% 47.1% 58.2% 42.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 46/50 1.3 2.7 61.4% 64.0% 51.2% 51.1% 47.6% 58.6% 41.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 36/42 2.5 3.1 61.1% 66.0% 51.6% 64.6% 42.4% 60.0% 42.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 39/41 2.0 3.4 61.1% 62.4% 48.9% 54.4% 37.3% 57.2% 39.6%
23 1991 34/41 1.7 1.9 64.4% 65.3% 50.1% 56.2% 43.2% 59.8% 41.8% 1996 13/18 1.6 3.2 53.2% 61.7% 49.9% 50.7% 47.8% 56.1% 36.9%
24 1992 39/45 1.9 3.4 59.7% 67.1% 47.7% 51.7% 43.1% 59.1% 40.0% 1997 48/55 3.4 2.1 50.9% 70.6% 54.1% 56.5% 43.0% 62.5% 40.7%
25 1993 41/51 1.9 2.3 59.2% 66.8% 52.9% 56.1% 45.2% 61.2% 42.3% 1998 42/54 3.0 2.0 54.4% 67.3% 51.7% 57.4% 43.3% 60.1% 40.6%
26 1994 48/55 2.6 3.6 58.4% 65.9% 49.2% 54.7% 47.5% 58.6% 39.8% 1999 51/61 3.1 2.4 58.3% 67.4% 50.4% 61.7% 41.5% 60.2% 38.7%
27 1995 32/37 2.1 3.5 56.4% 63.0% 49.0% 52.1% 44.1% 56.8% 38.9% 2000 51/61 3.2 2.6 55.4% 68.5% 52.3% 55.2% 44.2% 61.1% 39.0%
28 1996 4/4 2.0 2.5 57.1% 65.1% 45.1% 55.2% 34.7% 56.3% 37.9% 2001 51/61 2.8 1.7 57.0% 66.1% 51.9% 62.8% 47.5% 60.0% 39.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 43/52 3.9 2.7 56.0% 69.4% 53.4% 54.4% 42.1% 62.2% 40.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 38/38 2.9 2.2 59.9% 67.0% 49.7% 47.3% 39.7% 59.9% 39.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 31/33 4.2 1.8 56.0% 69.3% 51.0% 56.2% 37.7% 61.0% 38.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 37/37 3.4 1.4 58.5% 64.7% 51.6% 59.6% 36.9% 59.4% 40.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 42/42 4.3 2.6 58.4% 68.0% 48.9% 56.2% 46.1% 60.0% 38.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 43/43 5.0 1.5 55.7% 72.3% 54.2% 57.1% 45.6% 64.1% 38.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 35/35 3.5 1.3 57.5% 69.5% 53.5% 57.8% 41.1% 62.7% 37.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 35/35 4.8 1.9 56.6% 69.3% 49.5% 56.5% 41.4% 60.9% 36.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.2% 66.2% 48.8% 70.6% 50.0% 59.3% 30.4%
Career — 198/445 2.1 3.0 59.5% 65.7% 49.7% 54.2% 44.6% 59.1% 40.5% — 766/897 3.1 2.3 57.4% 67.1% 51.3% 56.5% 43.2% 60.3% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Yzaga Fabrice Santoro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1509 117.4 — — — — +25 +18 — 37.5% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.0 -0.24
17 1985 1604 127.0 — — — — +43 -84 — 52.0% +0.20 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 +0.03 1990 1685 143.3 — — — — -18 -64 — 53.2% -0.15 2–7 (22%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -1.45
18 1986 1681 130.9 — — — — +49 -160 — 49.5% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) 106.0 +0.57 1991 1698 140.2 -2.94 +4.41 1.033 50.6% -23 +17 — 55.5% +0.39 8–9 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.6 -0.38
19 1987 1709 133.4 — — — — +42 -156 -163 53.0% +0.35 9–9 (50%) 8–10 (44%) 100.2 +2.01 1992 1748 143.8 -2.09 +2.77 1.007 50.2% -63 +37 — 53.7% +0.24 7–6 (54%) 13–6 (68%) 108.5 -1.57
20 1988 1715 134.9 — — — — +11 -83 — 52.5% +0.03 3–8 (27%) 7–5 (58%) 97.1 +0.01 1993 1632 140.6 -2.07 +2.75 0.993 49.9% +48 +70 — 46.7% -0.12 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.03
21 1989 1836 138.2 — — — — -32 -65 — 58.0% +0.28 8–2 (80%) 11–4 (73%) 110.3 -0.30 1994 1737 139.2 -1.00 +3.08 1.062 51.3% -5 +10 — 56.3% +0.29 9–9 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 101.6 -0.43
22 1990 1696 124.9 — — — — -9 +28 — 47.9% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 5–11 (31%) 91.1 +1.56 1995 1611 128.7 -2.75 +0.77 0.927 48.4% -29 +106 — 43.8% -0.57 6–11 (35%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +0.74
23 1991 1767 145.9 -0.71 +2.47 1.039 50.7% +7 +8 — 58.4% +0.56 3–2 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -0.27 1996 1558 113.5 -2.78 -1.32 0.840 46.7% -8 +78 — 35.9% -1.13 2–2 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.8 +0.36
24 1992 1687 132.9 -1.49 +1.25 0.978 49.5% +49 +44 — 52.6% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 16–10 (62%) 108.0 +0.96 1997 1804 152.5 +0.69 +3.16 1.085 51.3% -35 -44 — 56.1% +0.33 11–9 (55%) 11–3 (79%) 111.3 -2.98
25 1993 1780 138.8 +0.23 +2.83 1.091 51.6% +2 -25 — 54.6% +0.25 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) 105.5 +0.39 1998 1709 143.8 -1.02 +2.20 1.017 50.4% -3 +74 — 50.7% -0.05 10–12 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 98.4 -0.42
26 1994 1729 142.4 -2.33 +1.95 0.961 49.2% +8 +57 — 51.0% -0.09 12–13 (48%) 14–8 (64%) 100.2 -0.52 1999 1766 144.6 -1.34 +1.00 0.973 49.6% +38 -13 -220 56.4% +0.23 10–5 (67%) 13–8 (62%) 106.5 +1.38
27 1995 1615 133.1 -2.92 +0.69 0.900 47.9% +78 +30 — 38.8% -0.62 8–9 (47%) 6–10 (38%) 96.1 -0.42 2000 1740 141.2 -0.34 +2.05 1.004 50.0% +13 +19 -204 51.0% -0.11 13–8 (62%) 10–12 (45%) 101.1 -0.61
28 1996 1610 108.4 -1.35 -0.59 0.868 47.4% +67 — — 44.4% -0.78 — — — +0.30 2001 1769 141.9 -1.14 +1.52 0.980 49.9% -19 +17 -124 56.3% +0.07 9–7 (56%) 10–6 (63%) 106.1 -0.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1740 141.0 -0.22 +2.22 1.064 51.1% +48 -51 -125 51.5% +0.12 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 95.5 +1.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1709 127.8 -1.70 +2.05 0.978 49.4% +20 -96 -93 45.7% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) 95.6 -0.35
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1816 137.3 -1.06 +1.68 0.997 49.9% -21 -159 — 50.0% +0.07 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -0.43
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1781 146.7 -1.92 +3.04 0.990 49.9% +42 -184 -142 50.0% +0.01 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 100.4 -2.81
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1702 141.3 -1.28 +1.44 0.957 49.5% +11 -128 +3 48.2% -0.10 4–9 (31%) 7–8 (47%) 94.8 -2.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1788 144.1 +1.04 +2.02 1.074 51.2% -11 — +11 55.1% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 12–5 (71%) 103.1 -1.41
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1758 141.9 -0.13 +0.94 0.995 50.0% +37 -208 +68 49.4% -0.26 3–2 (60%) 9–6 (60%) 103.6 -0.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1696 134.7 -1.83 -0.14 0.922 48.5% -3 -186 +180 42.9% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 4–9 (31%) 95.4 -1.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1690 110.3 +0.81 +1.44 0.747 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — -0.30
Career — 1872 141.9 -1.43 +1.83 0.991 49.8% +19 -19 -163 51.8% +0.06 83–67 (55%) 98–77 (56%) 106.1 +0.97 — 1890 147.6 -1.17 +2.02 1.000 50.0% +6 +5 -36 51.0% -0.01 147–150 (49%) 155–133 (54%) 103.9 -1.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.