H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Franco Davin H2H: 1-0
Jaime Yzaga holds a 1–0 lead over Franco Davin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1987 Florence third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1987* | Florence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 6-2 7-5 | Franco Davin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Franco Davin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |