H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jaime Yzaga vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 1-0

Jaime Yzaga holds a 1–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1994 Washington Open round of 32 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Yzaga
PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jaime Yzaga #25 6-3 7-6(4) Gianluca Pozzi #121 Match data Jul 21, 1994* R32 Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,872 239 206 53.7% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Yzaga Gianluca Pozzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,836 0 3 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0
22 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0
23 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,767 0 4 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0
24 1992 26–19 57.8% #49 1,687 0 6 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0
25 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,780 0 8 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0
26 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,728 0 8 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1
27 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,615 0 8 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1
28 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,609 0 8 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Yzaga Gianluca Pozzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1985 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 14 10 24 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 16 11 27 59.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 13 11 24 54.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 5 9 14 35.7% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1993 17 12 29 58.6% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1994 12 12 24 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1995 7 9 16 43.8% 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 1996 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 134 106 240 55.8% 82 73 155 52.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 18 20 38 47.4% — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Yzaga Gianluca Pozzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1985 1604 127.0 — — — — +43 -84 — 52.0% +0.20 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1681 130.9 — — — — +49 -160 — 49.5% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) 106.0 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1709 133.4 — — — — +42 -156 -163 53.0% +0.35 9–9 (50%) 8–10 (44%) 100.2 +2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 1715 134.9 — — — — +11 -83 — 52.5% +0.03 3–8 (27%) 7–5 (58%) 97.1 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 1836 138.2 — — — — -32 -65 — 58.0% +0.28 8–2 (80%) 11–4 (73%) 110.3 -0.30 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06
22 1990 1696 124.9 — — — — -9 +28 — 47.9% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 5–11 (31%) 91.1 +1.56 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04
23 1991 1767 145.9 -0.71 +2.47 1.039 50.7% +7 +8 — 58.4% +0.56 3–2 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -0.27 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.72
24 1992 1687 132.9 -1.49 +1.25 0.978 49.5% +49 +44 — 52.6% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 16–10 (62%) 108.0 +0.96 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +1.01
25 1993 1780 138.8 +0.23 +2.83 1.091 51.6% +2 -25 — 54.6% +0.25 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) 105.5 +0.39 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74
26 1994 1729 142.4 -2.33 +1.95 0.961 49.2% +8 +57 — 51.0% -0.09 12–13 (48%) 14–8 (64%) 100.2 -0.52 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 104.0 -0.02
27 1995 1615 133.1 -2.92 +0.69 0.900 47.9% +78 +30 — 38.8% -0.62 8–9 (47%) 6–10 (38%) 96.1 -0.42 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) 106.9 +0.05
28 1996 1610 108.4 -1.35 -0.59 0.868 47.4% +67 — — 44.4% -0.78 — — — +0.30 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -1.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 102.3 +1.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) 95.3 +0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 101.5 +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) 97.0 -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) 108.8 -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 91.1 +0.16
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1872 141.9 -1.43 +1.83 0.991 49.8% +19 -19 -163 51.8% +0.06 83–67 (55%) 98–77 (56%) 106.1 +0.97 — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.