H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Grant Connell H2H: 2-2
Jaime Yzaga and Grant Connell are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Grant Connell leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1994 Wimbledon second round 6-3 1-6 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Grant Connell | 6-3 1-6 6-1 7-6(4) | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1992* | Auckland | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-4 6-2 | Grant Connell | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1991* | Chicago | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Grant Connell | 6-4 6-4 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1990* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 7-6 4-6 7-6 | Grant Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |