H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 0-1
Guillaume Raoux holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1991 Canada Masters second round 6-3 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 1991* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Guillaume Raoux | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |