H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Henri Leconte H2H: 0-1
Henri Leconte holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1991 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Henri Leconte | 6-4 6-2 6-3 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 |