H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Horacio de la Pena H2H: 1-2
Horacio de la Pena holds a 2–1 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1993 Charlotte final 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1993* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1989* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-4 4-6 6-4 7-6 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1988* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Horacio de la Pena | 6-2 6-3 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Horacio de la Pena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |