H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs J. Gunnarsson H2H: 1-0
Jaime Yzaga holds a 1–0 lead over J. Gunnarsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1992 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1992* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-3 6-2 | J. Gunnarsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| J. Gunnarsson | #774 | #25 | 579 | 1,822 | 190 | 203 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | J. Gunnarsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #389 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #274 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #94 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #296 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |