H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 2-1
Jaime Yzaga holds a 2–1 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1992 Miami Masters third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1992* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 6-3 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1986* | Boca West | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 7-6 2-6 6-3 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 5-7 7-5 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |