H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Jay Berger H2H: 2-2
Jaime Yzaga and Jay Berger are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1990 Monte Carlo Masters third round 1-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 59
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1990* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 1-6 6-4 6-1 | Jay Berger | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1989* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jay Berger | 6-4 7-5 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Jay Berger | 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1987* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-2 6-1 | Jay Berger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Jay Berger | #1,121 | #7 | 1,271 | 1,952 | 141 | 80 | 63.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jay Berger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #250 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #47 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #10 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #387 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |