H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Jaime Yzaga vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 0-1

Jeff Tarango holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1993 Washington Open round of 32 6-1 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Yzaga
PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #71 6-1 7-6(6) Jaime Yzaga #51 Match data Jul 22, 1993* R32 Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,872 239 206 53.7% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Yzaga Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,836 0 3 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,767 0 4 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1992 26–19 57.8% #49 1,687 0 6 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,780 0 8 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,728 0 8 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,615 0 8 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,609 0 8 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Yzaga Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1985 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 14 10 24 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 16 11 27 59.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1988 13 11 24 54.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1990 5 9 14 35.7% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1993 17 12 29 58.6% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1994 12 12 24 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1995 7 9 16 43.8% 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 1996 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 134 106 240 55.8% 82 73 155 52.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 18 20 38 47.4% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/233 of Jaime Yzaga's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jaime Yzaga Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 1991 34/41 1.7 1.9 64.4% 65.3% 50.1% 56.2% 43.2% 59.8% 41.8% 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 1992 39/45 1.9 3.4 59.7% 67.1% 47.7% 51.7% 43.1% 59.1% 40.0% 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1993 41/51 1.9 2.3 59.2% 66.8% 52.9% 56.1% 45.2% 61.2% 42.3% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 1994 48/55 2.6 3.6 58.4% 65.9% 49.2% 54.7% 47.5% 58.6% 39.8% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 1995 32/37 2.1 3.5 56.4% 63.0% 49.0% 52.1% 44.1% 56.8% 38.9% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 1996 4/4 2.0 2.5 57.1% 65.1% 45.1% 55.2% 34.7% 56.3% 37.9% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
Career — 198/445 2.1 3.0 59.5% 65.7% 49.7% 54.2% 44.6% 59.1% 40.5% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Yzaga Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1985 1604 127.0 — — — — +43 -84 — 52.0% +0.20 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1681 130.9 — — — — +49 -160 — 49.5% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) 106.0 +0.57 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 1987 1709 133.4 — — — — +42 -156 -163 53.0% +0.35 9–9 (50%) 8–10 (44%) 100.2 +2.01 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 106.1 -0.05
20 1988 1715 134.9 — — — — +11 -83 — 52.5% +0.03 3–8 (27%) 7–5 (58%) 97.1 +0.01 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.0 +0.12
21 1989 1836 138.2 — — — — -32 -65 — 58.0% +0.28 8–2 (80%) 11–4 (73%) 110.3 -0.30 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +0.35
22 1990 1696 124.9 — — — — -9 +28 — 47.9% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 5–11 (31%) 91.1 +1.56 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) 104.0 +0.07
23 1991 1767 145.9 -0.71 +2.47 1.039 50.7% +7 +8 — 58.4% +0.56 3–2 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -0.27 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) 103.5 -1.21
24 1992 1687 132.9 -1.49 +1.25 0.978 49.5% +49 +44 — 52.6% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 16–10 (62%) 108.0 +0.96 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 102.6 -1.60
25 1993 1780 138.8 +0.23 +2.83 1.091 51.6% +2 -25 — 54.6% +0.25 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) 105.5 +0.39 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) 97.6 +1.47
26 1994 1729 142.4 -2.33 +1.95 0.961 49.2% +8 +57 — 51.0% -0.09 12–13 (48%) 14–8 (64%) 100.2 -0.52 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) 96.6 -1.34
27 1995 1615 133.1 -2.92 +0.69 0.900 47.9% +78 +30 — 38.8% -0.62 8–9 (47%) 6–10 (38%) 96.1 -0.42 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +0.93
28 1996 1610 108.4 -1.35 -0.59 0.868 47.4% +67 — — 44.4% -0.78 — — — +0.30 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) 94.7 -1.45
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) 92.8 +0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) 103.4 +1.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) 88.3 -0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1872 141.9 -1.43 +1.83 0.991 49.8% +19 -19 -163 51.8% +0.06 83–67 (55%) 98–77 (56%) 106.1 +0.97 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.