H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Jaime Yzaga vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 2-1

Jaime Yzaga holds a 2–1 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Bates won the 1994 Indianapolis round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Yzaga
PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Bates #75 6-4 6-3 Jaime Yzaga #24 Match data Aug 17, 1994* R64 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jaime Yzaga #51 7-6(3) 6-3 Jeremy Bates #140 Match data Jul 21, 1993* R64 Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jaime Yzaga #57 5-7 6-4 6-1 Jeremy Bates #110 Match data Oct 15, 1986* R64 Japan Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,872 239 206 53.7% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 117 175 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Yzaga Jeremy Bates
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0
19 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0
20 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0
21 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,836 0 3 1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0
22 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3 1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0
23 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,767 0 4 1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0
24 1992 26–19 57.8% #49 1,687 0 6 1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0
25 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,780 0 8 1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0
26 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,728 0 8 1988 15–19 44.1% #152 1,622 0 0
27 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,615 0 8 1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,659 0 0
28 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,609 0 8 1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,529 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,571 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,582 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,595 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,618 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Yzaga Jeremy Bates
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1985 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 14 10 24 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1987 16 11 27 59.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 13 11 24 54.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1990 5 9 14 35.7% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1993 17 12 29 58.6% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1994 12 12 24 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1995 7 9 16 43.8% 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 9 9 18 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 1996 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 134 106 240 55.8% 82 73 155 52.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 18 20 38 47.4% — 58 80 138 42.0% 8 21 29 27.6% 34 44 78 43.6% 17 30 47 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Yzaga Jeremy Bates
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1985 1604 127.0 — — — — +43 -84 — 52.0% +0.20 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1681 130.9 — — — — +49 -160 — 49.5% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) 106.0 +0.57 1980 1482 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25
19 1987 1709 133.4 — — — — +42 -156 -163 53.0% +0.35 9–9 (50%) 8–10 (44%) 100.2 +2.01 1981 1495 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.12
20 1988 1715 134.9 — — — — +11 -83 — 52.5% +0.03 3–8 (27%) 7–5 (58%) 97.1 +0.01 1982 1470 96.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 1989 1836 138.2 — — — — -32 -65 — 58.0% +0.28 8–2 (80%) 11–4 (73%) 110.3 -0.30 1983 1467 110.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21
22 1990 1696 124.9 — — — — -9 +28 — 47.9% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 5–11 (31%) 91.1 +1.56 1984 1398 90.5 — — — — — — +36 13.3% -2.33 0–2 1–1 — +0.70
23 1991 1767 145.9 -0.71 +2.47 1.039 50.7% +7 +8 — 58.4% +0.56 3–2 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -0.27 1985 1480 114.0 — — — — +93 — -61 46.8% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +1.57
24 1992 1687 132.9 -1.49 +1.25 0.978 49.5% +49 +44 — 52.6% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 16–10 (62%) 108.0 +0.96 1986 1514 122.4 — — — — +60 -52 -37 44.6% -0.57 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) 99.4 +0.61
25 1993 1780 138.8 +0.23 +2.83 1.091 51.6% +2 -25 — 54.6% +0.25 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) 105.5 +0.39 1987 1645 121.6 — — — — -17 — -76 51.7% +0.21 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 105.1 +0.46
26 1994 1729 142.4 -2.33 +1.95 0.961 49.2% +8 +57 — 51.0% -0.09 12–13 (48%) 14–8 (64%) 100.2 -0.52 1988 1623 121.3 — — — — -11 -108 -55 41.7% -0.74 10–5 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 105.6 +0.50
27 1995 1615 133.1 -2.92 +0.69 0.900 47.9% +78 +30 — 38.8% -0.62 8–9 (47%) 6–10 (38%) 96.1 -0.42 1989 1659 123.3 — — — — -14 -100 -69 52.3% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 +1.18
28 1996 1610 108.4 -1.35 -0.59 0.868 47.4% +67 — — 44.4% -0.78 — — — +0.30 1990 1529 118.0 — — — — +33 — +70 33.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 95.2 -0.28
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1572 117.8 +0.31 +0.02 0.958 49.0% -15 — +54 45.8% -0.50 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.30
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1582 113.5 -1.79 -1.18 0.850 47.0% -68 — +93 43.8% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 +0.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1595 125.5 -2.87 +0.17 0.884 47.4% -23 — +86 38.8% -0.60 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 102.6 +0.79
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1618 127.5 -0.88 -2.29 0.893 48.2% -29 — +141 52.4% -0.13 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 101.2 +1.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1523 122.8 -4.22 -1.39 0.847 46.5% +33 — +186 33.3% -1.05 5–2 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 105.0 +1.42
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1485 94.4 -1.81 -0.66 0.757 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
Career — 1872 141.9 -1.43 +1.83 0.991 49.8% +19 -19 -163 51.8% +0.06 83–67 (55%) 98–77 (56%) 106.1 +0.97 — 1718 125.6 -2.36 -1.12 0.872 47.3% +3 -78 +30 42.1% -0.60 42–45 (48%) 53–55 (49%) 104.9 +2.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.