Jaime Yzaga
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 8 | 9 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 1, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 5 | 2 | 7 | Oct 7, 1993 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC
Jaime Yzaga holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1994 Long Island round of 32 7-6(7) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | 7-6(7) 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data | Aug 25, 1994* | R32 | Long Island | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jaime Yzaga | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data | Nov 24, 1989* | R16 | Itaparica | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,872 | 239 | 206 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,780 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,728 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1985 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1985 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1990 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1986 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1991 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1987 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 24 | 1992 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 25 | 1993 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1989 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 26 | 1994 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1990 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 27 | 1995 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 28 | 1996 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 16 | 15 | 31 | 51.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 26.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 134 | 106 | 240 | 55.8% | 82 | 73 | 155 | 52.9% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 18 | 20 | 38 | 47.4% | — | 126 | 125 | 251 | 50.2% | 3 | 13 | 16 | 18.8% | 10 | 20 | 30 | 33.3% | 40 | 41 | 81 | 49.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/233 of Jaime Yzaga's and 169/198 of Jim Grabb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 23 | 1991 | 34/41 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 64.4% | 65.3% | 50.1% | 56.2% | 43.2% | 59.8% | 41.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1992 | 39/45 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 59.7% | 67.1% | 47.7% | 51.7% | 43.1% | 59.1% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 41/51 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 59.2% | 66.8% | 52.9% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 61.2% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 48/55 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 58.4% | 65.9% | 49.2% | 54.7% | 47.5% | 58.6% | 39.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 32/37 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 56.4% | 63.0% | 49.0% | 52.1% | 44.1% | 56.8% | 38.9% | 1991 | 37/42 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 64.9% | 72.2% | 48.6% | 59.8% | 37.6% | 64.1% | 36.3% |
| 28 | 1996 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 57.1% | 65.1% | 45.1% | 55.2% | 34.7% | 56.3% | 37.9% | 1992 | 50/55 | 6.4 | 3.1 | 64.6% | 75.8% | 47.8% | 54.4% | 35.0% | 66.0% | 35.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13/15 | 5.1 | 3.0 | 70.6% | 65.7% | 48.5% | 60.1% | 52.2% | 59.9% | 35.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 33/38 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 68.5% | 69.1% | 45.9% | 59.0% | 49.0% | 61.9% | 35.7% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20/23 | 5.7 | 2.9 | 64.8% | 68.9% | 47.3% | 65.1% | 27.2% | 61.3% | 32.8% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 10/16 | 7.1 | 5.5 | 65.1% | 74.5% | 44.0% | 58.1% | 52.2% | 63.5% | 33.7% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6/9 | 4.3 | 6.5 | 63.9% | 71.6% | 34.5% | 48.0% | 42.7% | 58.1% | 32.5% |
| Career | — | 198/445 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 59.5% | 65.7% | 49.7% | 54.2% | 44.6% | 59.1% | 40.5% | — | 169/378 | 6.1 | 3.5 | 65.9% | 71.9% | 46.9% | 58.2% | 40.0% | 63.3% | 35.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1985 | 1604 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -84 | — | 52.0% | +0.20 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.8 | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 1681 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -160 | — | 49.5% | -0.15 | 8–3 (73%) | 7–6 (54%) | 106.0 | +0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 1709 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -156 | -163 | 53.0% | +0.35 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–10 (44%) | 100.2 | +2.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 1715 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -83 | — | 52.5% | +0.03 | 3–8 (27%) | 7–5 (58%) | 97.1 | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 1836 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | -32 | -65 | — | 58.0% | +0.28 | 8–2 (80%) | 11–4 (73%) | 110.3 | -0.30 | 1985 | 1560 | 123.7 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.24 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.16 |
| 22 | 1990 | 1696 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +28 | — | 47.9% | -0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 5–11 (31%) | 91.1 | +1.56 | 1986 | 1636 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.40 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–4 (20%) | 101.3 | +0.05 |
| 23 | 1991 | 1767 | 145.9 | -0.71 | +2.47 | 1.039 | 50.7% | +7 | +8 | — | 58.4% | +0.56 | 3–2 (60%) | 6–1 (86%) | 106.0 | -0.27 | 1987 | 1688 | 137.5 | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | — | 48.8% | +0.04 | 4–2 (67%) | 10–2 (83%) | 107.9 | +1.31 |
| 24 | 1992 | 1687 | 132.9 | -1.49 | +1.25 | 0.978 | 49.5% | +49 | +44 | — | 52.6% | +0.03 | 11–4 (73%) | 16–10 (62%) | 108.0 | +0.96 | 1988 | 1562 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -58 | -17 | 45.0% | -0.28 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–7 (53%) | 100.0 | -0.31 |
| 25 | 1993 | 1780 | 138.8 | +0.23 | +2.83 | 1.091 | 51.6% | +2 | -25 | — | 54.6% | +0.25 | 12–9 (57%) | 17–10 (63%) | 105.5 | +0.39 | 1989 | 1768 | 139.4 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | — | 56.7% | +0.35 | 6–9 (40%) | 13–10 (57%) | 100.2 | -1.18 |
| 26 | 1994 | 1729 | 142.4 | -2.33 | +1.95 | 0.961 | 49.2% | +8 | +57 | — | 51.0% | -0.09 | 12–13 (48%) | 14–8 (64%) | 100.2 | -0.52 | 1990 | 1689 | 132.1 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -250 | -88 | 48.2% | -0.14 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–8 (43%) | 98.1 | -0.10 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1615 | 133.1 | -2.92 | +0.69 | 0.900 | 47.9% | +78 | +30 | — | 38.8% | -0.62 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–10 (38%) | 96.1 | -0.42 | 1991 | 1681 | 136.8 | +1.98 | -1.92 | 1.009 | 50.2% | +35 | — | -108 | 51.3% | +0.05 | 7–17 (29%) | 9–10 (47%) | 91.2 | +0.72 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1610 | 108.4 | -1.35 | -0.59 | 0.868 | 47.4% | +67 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.78 | — | — | — | +0.30 | 1992 | 1749 | 141.9 | +3.85 | -1.34 | 1.048 | 50.4% | +32 | -275 | -178 | 52.2% | +0.19 | 11–7 (61%) | 11–11 (50%) | 105.6 | +1.42 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1691 | 122.3 | -0.49 | -1.37 | 0.878 | 47.6% | +9 | — | — | 45.9% | -0.22 | 2–3 (40%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.3 | +0.36 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1670 | 136.2 | +0.52 | -2.08 | 0.937 | 48.9% | +50 | — | -139 | 50.0% | +0.04 | 7–8 (47%) | 5–8 (38%) | 98.4 | +0.09 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1546 | 127.6 | -0.66 | -2.43 | 0.847 | 47.4% | +34 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.11 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–9 (31%) | 91.9 | -1.25 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1565 | 120.0 | +0.58 | -1.86 | 0.923 | 48.7% | +2 | — | — | 41.9% | -0.53 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–6 (25%) | 98.0 | +0.17 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1516 | 104.9 | -2.13 | -1.64 | 0.777 | 45.3% | +9 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.17 |
| Career | — | 1872 | 141.9 | -1.43 | +1.83 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +19 | -19 | -163 | 51.8% | +0.06 | 83–67 (55%) | 98–77 (56%) | 106.1 | +0.97 | — | 1829 | 140.2 | +1.52 | -1.78 | 0.959 | 49.2% | +30 | -207 | -102 | 48.5% | -0.08 | 58–69 (46%) | 75–85 (47%) | 96.6 | +0.43 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 8 | 9 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 1, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 5 | 2 | 7 | Oct 7, 1993 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | 2 | 6 | 8 | Mar 15, 1995 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 15, 1992 | H2H |
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 16, 1997 | H2H |
| Jason Stoltenberg | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 18, 1997 | H2H |
| Jim Courier | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 11, 1995 | H2H |