H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jaime Yzaga vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 2-1

Jaime Yzaga holds a 2–1 lead over Jimmy Connors in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1992 Scottsdale third round 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Yzaga
PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 1992* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Jaime Yzaga #57 7-5 4-6 6-3 Jimmy Connors #38 Match data
Feb 28, 1991* Chicago ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jaime Yzaga #65 6-3 6-0 Jimmy Connors #990 Match data
Feb 28, 1986* La Quinta ATP 250 R16 Hard Jimmy Connors #4 6-1 6-2 Jaime Yzaga #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,870 238 205 53.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Yzaga Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,604 0 0 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,843 0 3 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,766 0 4 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1992 25–18 58.1% #49 1,687 0 6 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,779 0 8 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,726 0 8 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,613 0 8 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,608 0 8 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 — — — — — — — 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 — — — — — — — 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 — — — — — — — 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109