H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs John McEnroe H2H: 0-1
John McEnroe holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John McEnroe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John McEnroe won the 1986 Scottsdale fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1986* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | John McEnroe | 6-3 6-4 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| John McEnroe | #1,219 | #1 | 1,506 | 2,496 | 833 | 189 | 81.5% | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 63 | 76 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | John McEnroe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #21 | 1,852 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 77–19 | 80.2% | #4 | 2,149 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 88–13 | 87.1% | #3 | 2,284 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 83–16 | 83.8% | #2 | 2,255 | 2 | 24 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #1 | 2,265 | 4 | 33 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,278 | 4 | 38 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 62–9 | 87.3% | #1 | 2,306 | 5 | 45 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 71–2 | 97.3% | #1 | 2,475 | 7 | 58 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1985 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,273 | 7 | 66 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 22–5 | 81.5% | #14 | 2,180 | 7 | 69 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #10 | 2,094 | 7 | 69 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,023 | 7 | 71 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 45–11 | 80.4% | #4 | 2,096 | 7 | 74 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #13 | 1,967 | 7 | 75 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #28 | 1,831 | 7 | 76 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #20 | 1,882 | 7 | 76 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,871 | 7 | 76 |