Jaime Yzaga
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 8 | 9 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 1, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 5 | 2 | 7 | Oct 7, 1993 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Jonathan Canter H2H: 0-2
Jonathan Canter holds a 2–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonathan Canter leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1986 Hong Kong Open round of 16 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | 6-3 6-4 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data | Oct 31, 1986* | R16 | Hong Kong Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jonathan Canter | 6-4 6-3 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data | Aug 6, 1986* | R64 | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,872 | 239 | 206 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,794 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,780 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,728 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1985 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1986 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1983 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1984 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1988 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1989 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1986 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1990 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1987 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1991 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1988 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1992 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1993 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1990 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1994 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 134 | 106 | 240 | 55.8% | 82 | 73 | 155 | 52.9% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 18 | 20 | 38 | 47.4% | — | 47 | 52 | 99 | 47.5% | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 9 | 18 | 27 | 33.3% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/233 of Jaime Yzaga's and 8/8 of Jonathan Canter's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 23 | 1991 | 34/41 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 64.4% | 65.3% | 50.1% | 56.2% | 43.2% | 59.8% | 41.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1992 | 39/45 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 59.7% | 67.1% | 47.7% | 51.7% | 43.1% | 59.1% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 41/51 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 59.2% | 66.8% | 52.9% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 61.2% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 48/55 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 58.4% | 65.9% | 49.2% | 54.7% | 47.5% | 58.6% | 39.8% | 1991 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 58.9% | 72.4% | 42.1% | 47.2% | 12.5% | 59.9% | 30.4% |
| 27 | 1995 | 32/37 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 56.4% | 63.0% | 49.0% | 52.1% | 44.1% | 56.8% | 38.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 57.1% | 65.1% | 45.1% | 55.2% | 34.7% | 56.3% | 37.9% | 1993 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 48.7% | 73.3% | 56.6% | 45.0% | 36.2% | 64.8% | 38.9% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 54.3% | 63.2% | 43.6% | 56.1% | 31.0% | 54.5% | 36.2% |
| Career | — | 198/445 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 59.5% | 65.7% | 49.7% | 54.2% | 44.6% | 59.1% | 40.5% | — | 8/164 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 53.4% | 69.3% | 48.1% | 49.7% | 28.3% | 59.7% | 35.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1985 | 1604 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -84 | — | 52.0% | +0.20 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.03 | 1982 | 1506 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 26.7% | -2.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.78 |
| 18 | 1986 | 1681 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -160 | — | 49.5% | -0.15 | 8–3 (73%) | 7–6 (54%) | — | +0.57 | 1983 | 1513 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 27.8% | -1.39 | 2–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.20 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1709 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -156 | -163 | 53.0% | +0.35 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–10 (44%) | — | +2.01 | 1984 | 1464 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 15.4% | -2.00 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.25 |
| 20 | 1988 | 1715 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -83 | — | 52.5% | +0.03 | 3–8 (27%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +0.01 | 1985 | 1637 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | -52 | — | +5 | 55.3% | +0.49 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +2.25 |
| 21 | 1989 | 1836 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | -32 | -65 | — | 58.0% | +0.28 | 8–2 (80%) | 11–4 (73%) | — | -0.30 | 1986 | 1734 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -236 | -104 | 54.3% | +0.18 | 11–11 (50%) | 10–11 (48%) | — | +0.70 |
| 22 | 1990 | 1696 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +28 | — | 47.9% | -0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 5–11 (31%) | — | +1.56 | 1987 | 1602 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | +44 | -90 | — | 31.1% | -1.15 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.84 |
| 23 | 1991 | 1767 | 145.9 | -0.71 | +2.47 | 1.039 | 50.7% | +7 | +8 | — | 58.4% | +0.56 | 3–2 (60%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | -0.27 | 1988 | 1584 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 31.3% | -1.06 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.02 |
| 24 | 1992 | 1687 | 132.9 | -1.49 | +1.25 | 0.978 | 49.5% | +49 | +44 | — | 52.6% | +0.03 | 11–4 (73%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | +0.96 | 1989 | 1533 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | -31 | 42.6% | -0.20 | 0–7 (0%) | 1–7 (13%) | — | +0.68 |
| 25 | 1993 | 1780 | 138.8 | +0.23 | +2.83 | 1.091 | 51.6% | +2 | -25 | — | 54.6% | +0.25 | 12–9 (57%) | 17–10 (63%) | — | +0.39 | 1990 | 1559 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.61 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.78 |
| 26 | 1994 | 1729 | 142.4 | -2.33 | +1.95 | 0.961 | 49.2% | +8 | +57 | — | 51.0% | -0.09 | 12–13 (48%) | 14–8 (64%) | — | -0.52 | 1991 | 1540 | 106.6 | -0.46 | +0.70 | 0.758 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.20 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1615 | 133.1 | -2.92 | +0.69 | 0.900 | 47.9% | +78 | +30 | — | 38.8% | -0.62 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 1610 | 108.4 | -1.35 | -0.59 | 0.868 | 47.4% | +67 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.78 | — | — | — | +0.30 | 1993 | 1580 | 116.6 | +0.08 | +1.04 | 1.103 | 51.6% | +20 | — | — | 62.5% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1543 | 103.5 | -1.08 | -0.13 | 0.796 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.29 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.22 |
| Career | — | 1872 | 141.9 | -1.43 | +1.83 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +19 | -19 | -163 | 51.8% | +0.06 | 83–67 (55%) | 98–77 (56%) | 106.1 | +0.97 | — | 1794 | 132.1 | -0.49 | +0.52 | 0.887 | 48.0% | +18 | -163 | -19 | 44.1% | -0.29 | 23–37 (38%) | 21–34 (38%) | 88.2 | +2.44 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Jonathan Canter
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Evernden | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 3, 1990 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Eliot Teltscher | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 1988 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 20, 1987 | H2H |