H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Kevin Curren H2H: 1-1
Jaime Yzaga and Kevin Curren are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1991 Chicago fourth round 6-1 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1991* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jaime Yzaga | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1988* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kevin Curren | 1-6 6-2 6-0 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Kevin Curren | #1,179 | #5 | 684 | 2,060 | 339 | 238 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Kevin Curren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1985 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #18 | 1,886 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #20 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #71 | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #58 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #147 | 1,653 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,631 | 0 | 5 |