H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-0
Jaime Yzaga holds a 1–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics second round 1-6 7-6(4) 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-0 6-0 | Leander Paes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,872 | 239 | 206 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,737 | 53 | 77 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,780 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,728 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |