H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 2-3
Luiz Mattar holds a 3–2 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1992 Sao Paulo semifinal 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1992* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Luiz Mattar | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1992* | Tampa | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 7-6(7) 6-7(2) 6-2 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1991* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Luiz Mattar | 6-2 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1989* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Luiz Mattar | 6-3 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1987* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |