H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Luke Jensen H2H: 1-0
Jaime Yzaga holds a 1–0 lead over Luke Jensen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1988 Rome second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1988* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 6-2 6-3 | Luke Jensen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Luke Jensen | #962 | #168 | 114 | 1,540 | 12 | 43 | 21.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Luke Jensen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #402 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #271 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #493 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #762 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #359 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #335 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #519 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |