H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Michael Stich H2H: 0-2
Michael Stich holds a 2–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1995 Munich third round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1995* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Michael Stich | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Michael Stich | 7-6(5) 6-2 6-1 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Michael Stich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 |