H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Michiel Schapers H2H: 1-0
Jaime Yzaga holds a 1–0 lead over Michiel Schapers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1991 Australian Open second round 7-6(2) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 7-6(2) 6-4 6-2 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Michiel Schapers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |