Jaime Yzaga
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 8 | 9 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 1, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 5 | 2 | 7 | Oct 7, 1993 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Mikael Tillstrom H2H: 0-1
Mikael Tillstrom holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikael Tillstrom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikael Tillstrom won the 1992 Dutch Open round of 32 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Tillstrom | 7-5 7-5 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data | Jul 23, 1992* | R32 | Dutch Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,872 | 239 | 206 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Mikael Tillstrom | #506 | #39 | 966 | 1,833 | 109 | 109 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #141 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #149 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #116 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,780 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #68 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,728 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #85 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1985 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1990 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1991 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1995 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1992 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 25 | 1993 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1997 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 26 | 1994 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1998 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 27 | 1995 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1999 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 28 | 1996 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 134 | 106 | 240 | 55.8% | 82 | 73 | 155 | 52.9% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 18 | 20 | 38 | 47.4% | — | 65 | 53 | 118 | 55.1% | 27 | 33 | 60 | 45.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/233 of Jaime Yzaga's and 191/218 of Mikael Tillstrom's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11/11 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 53.7% | 68.0% | 49.2% | 45.2% | 53.6% | 59.3% | 42.5% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 57.3% | 53.6% | 37.5% | 49.4% | 42.8% | 47.1% | 33.3% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6/6 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 59.9% | 71.9% | 49.8% | 52.2% | 35.7% | 63.3% | 42.7% |
| 23 | 1991 | 34/41 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 64.4% | 65.3% | 50.1% | 56.2% | 43.2% | 59.8% | 41.8% | 1995 | 6/7 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 55.5% | 72.0% | 50.2% | 62.8% | 36.6% | 62.2% | 38.5% |
| 24 | 1992 | 39/45 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 59.7% | 67.1% | 47.7% | 51.7% | 43.1% | 59.1% | 40.0% | 1996 | 35/43 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 61.4% | 68.6% | 50.5% | 58.3% | 43.0% | 61.7% | 37.2% |
| 25 | 1993 | 41/51 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 59.2% | 66.8% | 52.9% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 61.2% | 42.3% | 1997 | 36/40 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 56.3% | 67.8% | 48.1% | 57.3% | 43.5% | 59.0% | 37.0% |
| 26 | 1994 | 48/55 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 58.4% | 65.9% | 49.2% | 54.7% | 47.5% | 58.6% | 39.8% | 1998 | 36/41 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 56.1% | 70.5% | 49.8% | 55.9% | 45.3% | 61.4% | 39.8% |
| 27 | 1995 | 32/37 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 56.4% | 63.0% | 49.0% | 52.1% | 44.1% | 56.8% | 38.9% | 1999 | 29/33 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 60.4% | 64.3% | 47.6% | 54.4% | 38.7% | 57.1% | 37.2% |
| 28 | 1996 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 57.1% | 65.1% | 45.1% | 55.2% | 34.7% | 56.3% | 37.9% | 2000 | 29/34 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 61.8% | 71.0% | 50.7% | 54.3% | 43.1% | 63.3% | 37.8% |
| Career | — | 198/445 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 59.5% | 65.7% | 49.7% | 54.2% | 44.6% | 59.1% | 40.5% | — | 191/218 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 58.6% | 68.4% | 49.2% | 55.5% | 43.1% | 60.4% | 38.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1985 | 1604 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -84 | — | 52.0% | +0.20 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.8 | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 1681 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -160 | — | 49.5% | -0.15 | 8–3 (73%) | 7–6 (54%) | 106.0 | +0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 1709 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -156 | -163 | 53.0% | +0.35 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–10 (44%) | 100.2 | +2.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 1715 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -83 | — | 52.5% | +0.03 | 3–8 (27%) | 7–5 (58%) | 97.1 | +0.01 | 1992 | 1610 | 130.5 | -0.02 | +0.86 | 1.043 | 51.1% | — | +50 | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.32 |
| 21 | 1989 | 1836 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | -32 | -65 | — | 58.0% | +0.28 | 8–2 (80%) | 11–4 (73%) | 110.3 | -0.30 | 1993 | 1565 | 98.7 | -2.61 | -4.01 | 0.629 | 40.6% | — | +48 | — | 14.3% | -3.43 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.08 |
| 22 | 1990 | 1696 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +28 | — | 47.9% | -0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 5–11 (31%) | 91.1 | +1.56 | 1994 | 1659 | 123.3 | +0.12 | +3.90 | 1.163 | 52.0% | — | +33 | — | 65.0% | +0.95 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.08 |
| 23 | 1991 | 1767 | 145.9 | -0.71 | +2.47 | 1.039 | 50.7% | +7 | +8 | — | 58.4% | +0.56 | 3–2 (60%) | 6–1 (86%) | 106.0 | -0.27 | 1995 | 1700 | 128.4 | +0.34 | +0.88 | 1.020 | 50.0% | -116 | +8 | — | 57.9% | +0.10 | 1–1 | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.51 |
| 24 | 1992 | 1687 | 132.9 | -1.49 | +1.25 | 0.978 | 49.5% | +49 | +44 | — | 52.6% | +0.03 | 11–4 (73%) | 16–10 (62%) | 108.0 | +0.96 | 1996 | 1758 | 143.5 | +0.31 | -0.34 | 0.972 | 49.6% | -20 | -38 | -90 | 50.4% | -0.11 | 14–6 (70%) | 13–10 (57%) | 110.0 | -1.65 |
| 25 | 1993 | 1780 | 138.8 | +0.23 | +2.83 | 1.091 | 51.6% | +2 | -25 | — | 54.6% | +0.25 | 12–9 (57%) | 17–10 (63%) | 105.5 | +0.39 | 1997 | 1645 | 136.5 | -2.09 | -0.47 | 0.901 | 48.2% | +49 | +14 | — | 46.1% | -0.39 | 7–10 (41%) | 12–6 (67%) | 101.9 | -0.19 |
| 26 | 1994 | 1729 | 142.4 | -2.33 | +1.95 | 0.961 | 49.2% | +8 | +57 | — | 51.0% | -0.09 | 12–13 (48%) | 14–8 (64%) | 100.2 | -0.52 | 1998 | 1645 | 134.6 | -0.69 | +1.32 | 1.030 | 50.7% | +38 | -20 | — | 49.5% | +0.18 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.3 | +1.60 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1615 | 133.1 | -2.92 | +0.69 | 0.900 | 47.9% | +78 | +30 | — | 38.8% | -0.62 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–10 (38%) | 96.1 | -0.42 | 1999 | 1686 | 128.2 | -2.99 | +0.64 | 0.869 | 47.5% | +38 | -88 | — | 44.3% | -0.57 | 9–5 (64%) | 6–4 (60%) | 105.4 | -0.10 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1610 | 108.4 | -1.35 | -0.59 | 0.868 | 47.4% | +67 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.78 | — | — | — | +0.30 | 2000 | 1669 | 136.1 | +0.93 | +0.39 | 1.030 | 50.2% | +50 | -32 | — | 49.4% | -0.07 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–6 (45%) | 99.9 | -0.68 |
| Career | — | 1872 | 141.9 | -1.43 | +1.83 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +19 | -19 | -163 | 51.8% | +0.06 | 83–67 (55%) | 98–77 (56%) | 106.1 | +0.97 | — | 1833 | 142.0 | -0.81 | +0.39 | 0.964 | 49.3% | +27 | -4 | -90 | 49.1% | -0.13 | 48–38 (56%) | 50–34 (60%) | 111.2 | -0.56 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Mikael Tillstrom
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jan 21, 2000 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 6, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 15, 2000 | H2H |
| Andrei Cherkasov | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jan 7, 2000 | H2H |