Jaime Yzaga
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 8 | 9 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 1, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 5 | 2 | 7 | Oct 7, 1993 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Jaime Yzaga holds a 2–0 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1994 Hamburg Open round of 64 2-6 6-2 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | 2-6 6-2 7-6(8) | Nicklas Kulti | Match data | May 4, 1994* | R64 | Hamburg Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Jaime Yzaga | 6-2 7-5 5-7 6-1 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data | Jun 26, 1991* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,872 | 239 | 206 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,821 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,780 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,728 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1985 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1986 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1989 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1987 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1990 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 1988 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1991 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 21 | 1989 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1992 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 22 | 1990 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1993 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 23 | 1991 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1994 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1992 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1996 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1994 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1997 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1995 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1998 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1996 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 134 | 106 | 240 | 55.8% | 82 | 73 | 155 | 52.9% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 18 | 20 | 38 | 47.4% | — | 54 | 73 | 127 | 42.5% | 53 | 59 | 112 | 47.3% | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 29 | 34 | 63 | 46.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/233 of Jaime Yzaga's and 252/280 of Nicklas Kulti's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 39/42 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 56.0% | 68.8% | 50.5% | 55.6% | 43.7% | 60.6% | 38.6% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 40/41 | 3.8 | 2.6 | 59.5% | 70.2% | 49.0% | 50.1% | 37.9% | 61.6% | 39.3% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 46/51 | 4.9 | 3.1 | 56.1% | 72.0% | 49.9% | 58.2% | 39.3% | 62.4% | 36.8% |
| 23 | 1991 | 34/41 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 64.4% | 65.3% | 50.1% | 56.2% | 43.2% | 59.8% | 41.8% | 1994 | 39/46 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 57.2% | 72.3% | 49.6% | 59.3% | 40.3% | 62.4% | 36.0% |
| 24 | 1992 | 39/45 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 59.7% | 67.1% | 47.7% | 51.7% | 43.1% | 59.1% | 40.0% | 1995 | 13/14 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 52.0% | 76.3% | 53.0% | 64.6% | 44.4% | 65.0% | 39.0% |
| 25 | 1993 | 41/51 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 59.2% | 66.8% | 52.9% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 61.2% | 42.3% | 1996 | 27/30 | 7.2 | 3.8 | 58.6% | 74.3% | 49.9% | 63.4% | 39.5% | 64.5% | 36.8% |
| 26 | 1994 | 48/55 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 58.4% | 65.9% | 49.2% | 54.7% | 47.5% | 58.6% | 39.8% | 1997 | 24/26 | 7.1 | 4.7 | 53.7% | 75.0% | 46.7% | 63.0% | 32.6% | 62.1% | 34.5% |
| 27 | 1995 | 32/37 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 56.4% | 63.0% | 49.0% | 52.1% | 44.1% | 56.8% | 38.9% | 1998 | 5/6 | 7.8 | 3.8 | 47.9% | 84.3% | 53.6% | 76.4% | 25.0% | 68.5% | 32.6% |
| 28 | 1996 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 57.1% | 65.1% | 45.1% | 55.2% | 34.7% | 56.3% | 37.9% | 1999 | 15/19 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 54.7% | 73.8% | 46.1% | 57.2% | 37.8% | 61.1% | 35.7% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4/5 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 52.6% | 70.6% | 37.1% | 61.1% | 19.8% | 54.8% | 32.6% |
| Career | — | 198/445 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 59.5% | 65.7% | 49.7% | 54.2% | 44.6% | 59.1% | 40.5% | — | 252/329 | 5.2 | 3.2 | 56.3% | 72.4% | 49.3% | 58.4% | 38.9% | 62.3% | 37.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1985 | 1604 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -84 | — | 52.0% | +0.20 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.8 | +0.03 | 1988 | 1544 | 129.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +26 | — | 47.1% | -0.12 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.72 |
| 18 | 1986 | 1681 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -160 | — | 49.5% | -0.15 | 8–3 (73%) | 7–6 (54%) | 106.0 | +0.57 | 1989 | 1584 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | -17 | +11 | — | 42.9% | 0.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–5 (17%) | 96.2 | +0.42 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1709 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -156 | -163 | 53.0% | +0.35 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–10 (44%) | 100.2 | +2.01 | 1990 | 1747 | 143.3 | — | — | — | — | -93 | -13 | — | 53.7% | +0.33 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–5 (29%) | 102.3 | -1.04 |
| 20 | 1988 | 1715 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -83 | — | 52.5% | +0.03 | 3–8 (27%) | 7–5 (58%) | 97.1 | +0.01 | 1991 | 1657 | 134.7 | -0.06 | +0.03 | 0.980 | 49.6% | +1 | +1 | — | 44.8% | -0.17 | 4–9 (31%) | 5–10 (33%) | 92.6 | -1.75 |
| 21 | 1989 | 1836 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | -32 | -65 | — | 58.0% | +0.28 | 8–2 (80%) | 11–4 (73%) | 110.3 | -0.30 | 1992 | 1612 | 138.5 | +0.13 | +0.37 | 1.025 | 50.2% | -4 | +108 | — | 47.9% | -0.10 | 6–11 (35%) | 7–10 (41%) | 93.6 | -0.36 |
| 22 | 1990 | 1696 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +28 | — | 47.9% | -0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 5–11 (31%) | 91.1 | +1.56 | 1993 | 1684 | 141.0 | +1.24 | -0.26 | 0.979 | 49.6% | +21 | -5 | — | 52.0% | -0.13 | 7–8 (47%) | 9–9 (50%) | 101.1 | -1.65 |
| 23 | 1991 | 1767 | 145.9 | -0.71 | +2.47 | 1.039 | 50.7% | +7 | +8 | — | 58.4% | +0.56 | 3–2 (60%) | 6–1 (86%) | 106.0 | -0.27 | 1994 | 1677 | 146.6 | +1.15 | -1.53 | 0.958 | 49.3% | +55 | -21 | — | 48.0% | -0.24 | 7–14 (33%) | 7–9 (44%) | 94.7 | -2.66 |
| 24 | 1992 | 1687 | 132.9 | -1.49 | +1.25 | 0.978 | 49.5% | +49 | +44 | — | 52.6% | +0.03 | 11–4 (73%) | 16–10 (62%) | 108.0 | +0.96 | 1995 | 1640 | 120.1 | +1.85 | -0.53 | 1.112 | 51.8% | +24 | +47 | — | 46.9% | +0.09 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.38 |
| 25 | 1993 | 1780 | 138.8 | +0.23 | +2.83 | 1.091 | 51.6% | +2 | -25 | — | 54.6% | +0.25 | 12–9 (57%) | 17–10 (63%) | 105.5 | +0.39 | 1996 | 1635 | 123.0 | +2.52 | -1.04 | 1.037 | 50.5% | -63 | +19 | -11 | 48.8% | +0.01 | 4–6 (40%) | 12–7 (63%) | 100.7 | -0.43 |
| 26 | 1994 | 1729 | 142.4 | -2.33 | +1.95 | 0.961 | 49.2% | +8 | +57 | — | 51.0% | -0.09 | 12–13 (48%) | 14–8 (64%) | 100.2 | -0.52 | 1997 | 1580 | 122.1 | +0.06 | -1.60 | 0.910 | 48.5% | +24 | +9 | +52 | 41.8% | -0.81 | 2–6 (25%) | 6–2 (75%) | 98.2 | -0.05 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1615 | 133.1 | -2.92 | +0.69 | 0.900 | 47.9% | +78 | +30 | — | 38.8% | -0.62 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–10 (38%) | 96.1 | -0.42 | 1998 | 1603 | 115.4 | +2.10 | -1.26 | 1.036 | 50.2% | +20 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.15 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.15 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1610 | 108.4 | -1.35 | -0.59 | 0.868 | 47.4% | +67 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.78 | — | — | — | +0.30 | 1999 | 1633 | 114.5 | +0.18 | -1.35 | 0.918 | 48.5% | -58 | -39 | +43 | 51.1% | -0.21 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.0 | +0.03 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1560 | 104.0 | -2.23 | -1.39 | 0.720 | 44.3% | — | — | — | 15.4% | -2.39 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 |
| Career | — | 1872 | 141.9 | -1.43 | +1.83 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +19 | -19 | -163 | 51.8% | +0.06 | 83–67 (55%) | 98–77 (56%) | 106.1 | +0.97 | — | 1821 | 141.1 | +0.80 | -0.64 | 0.981 | 49.6% | +4 | +16 | +28 | 47.4% | -0.18 | 41–68 (38%) | 57–63 (48%) | 93.7 | -2.41 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 8 | 9 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 1, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 5 | 2 | 7 | Oct 7, 1993 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 19, 1997 | H2H |
| Alexander Volkov | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 17, 1994 | H2H |
| Andrei Medvedev | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Marc Rosset | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 14, 1997 | H2H |
| Magnus Gustafsson | 2 | 3 | 5 | Aug 7, 1993 | H2H |