H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Paolo Cane H2H: 0-2
Paolo Cane holds a 2–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1994 Rome Masters second round 6-4 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1994* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 6-4 1-6 7-5 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1988* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Paolo Cane | 3-6 6-1 6-7 6-3 7-6 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |