H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Jaime Yzaga vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 0-3

Paul Haarhuis holds a 3–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1995 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-4.

PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 3
3 main draw meetings
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 26, 1995* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Paul Haarhuis #33 6-2 6-4 Jaime Yzaga #30 Match data
Feb 17, 1995* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Paul Haarhuis #48 6-4 3-6 6-3 Jaime Yzaga #30 Match data
Feb 19, 1994* Philadelphia ATP 250 SF Carpet Paul Haarhuis #36 6-3 6-3 Jaime Yzaga #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,870 238 205 53.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,885 250 245 50.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Yzaga Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,604 0 0
18 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0
19 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2
20 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3
21 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,843 0 3
22 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,766 0 4 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 1992 25–18 58.1% #49 1,687 0 6 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,668 0 0
25 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,779 0 8 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,728 0 0
26 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,726 0 8 1992 32–28 53.3% #39 1,681 0 0
27 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,613 0 8 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,762 0 0
28 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,608 0 8 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,714 0 0
29 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,714 0 1
30 1996 30–27 52.6% #25 1,746 0 1
31 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,676 0 1
32 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,663 0 1
33 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1