H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 1-3
Renzo Furlan holds a 3–1 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Renzo Furlan leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Renzo Furlan won the 1995 Sydney Outdoor fourth round 7-5 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1995* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Renzo Furlan | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1993* | Santiago | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 7-5 7-6(6) | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1993* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Renzo Furlan | 6-2 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| May 15, 1991* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Renzo Furlan | 6-4 6-0 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Renzo Furlan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |