H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Scott Davis H2H: 3-1
Jaime Yzaga holds a 3–1 lead over Scott Davis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1989 Orlando third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1989* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 7-5 6-1 | Scott Davis | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-2 6-1 (ret.) | Scott Davis | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1988* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Scott Davis | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1987* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jaime Yzaga | 6-2 6-3 | Scott Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Scott Davis | #852 | #11 | 638 | 1,923 | 206 | 197 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Scott Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #457 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #143 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |