H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 2-1
Jaime Yzaga holds a 2–1 lead over Stefan Edberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 2–0 on clay, while Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1994 Hamburg Masters third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1994* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 6-4 7-5 | Stefan Edberg | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1994* | Madrid | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 6-4 6-2 | Stefan Edberg | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 6-2 6-3 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 |