H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jaime Yzaga vs Thomas Muster H2H: 0-3

Thomas Muster holds a 3–0 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1994 Madrid semifinal 6-0 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Yzaga
PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Muster #11 6-0 5-7 6-3 Jaime Yzaga #28 Match data Apr 30, 1994* SF Madrid ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Thomas Muster #11 4-6 7-6(0) 6-3 Jaime Yzaga #28 Match data Mar 3, 1994* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thomas Muster #6 6-2 6-2 4-6 5-7 7-6 Jaime Yzaga #68 Match data Sep 2, 1990* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,872 239 206 53.7% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Yzaga Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,603 0 0 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0
18 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1
19 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5
21 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,836 0 3 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5
22 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8
23 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,767 0 4 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 1992 26–19 57.8% #49 1,687 0 6 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13
25 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,780 0 8 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,728 0 8 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23
27 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,615 0 8 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35
28 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,609 0 8 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42
29 — — — — — — — 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44
30 — — — — — — — 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44
31 — — — — — — — 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44
42 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44
43 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Yzaga Thomas Muster
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1985 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1986 14 10 24 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1987 16 11 27 59.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1988 13 11 24 54.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
21 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1990 5 9 14 35.7% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1993 17 12 29 58.6% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1994 12 12 24 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1995 7 9 16 43.8% 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6%
28 1996 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 134 106 240 55.8% 82 73 155 52.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 18 20 38 47.4% — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/233 of Jaime Yzaga's and 527/612 of Thomas Muster's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jaime Yzaga Thomas Muster
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1991 34/41 1.7 1.9 64.4% 65.3% 50.1% 56.2% 43.2% 59.8% 41.8% 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0%
24 1992 39/45 1.9 3.4 59.7% 67.1% 47.7% 51.7% 43.1% 59.1% 40.0% 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7%
25 1993 41/51 1.9 2.3 59.2% 66.8% 52.9% 56.1% 45.2% 61.2% 42.3% 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4%
26 1994 48/55 2.6 3.6 58.4% 65.9% 49.2% 54.7% 47.5% 58.6% 39.8% 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8%
27 1995 32/37 2.1 3.5 56.4% 63.0% 49.0% 52.1% 44.1% 56.8% 38.9% 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6%
28 1996 4/4 2.0 2.5 57.1% 65.1% 45.1% 55.2% 34.7% 56.3% 37.9% 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9%
Career — 198/445 2.1 3.0 59.5% 65.7% 49.7% 54.2% 44.6% 59.1% 40.5% — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Yzaga Thomas Muster
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24
17 1985 1604 127.0 — — — — +43 -84 — 52.0% +0.20 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
18 1986 1681 130.9 — — — — +49 -160 — 49.5% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.57 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90
19 1987 1709 133.4 — — — — +42 -156 -163 53.0% +0.35 9–9 (50%) 8–10 (44%) — +2.01 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14
20 1988 1715 134.9 — — — — +11 -83 — 52.5% +0.03 3–8 (27%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.01 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96
21 1989 1836 138.2 — — — — -32 -65 — 58.0% +0.28 8–2 (80%) 11–4 (73%) — -0.30 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55
22 1990 1696 124.9 — — — — -9 +28 — 47.9% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 5–11 (31%) — +1.56 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89
23 1991 1767 145.9 -0.71 +2.47 1.039 50.7% +7 +8 — 58.4% +0.56 3–2 (60%) 6–1 (86%) — -0.27 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44
24 1992 1687 132.9 -1.49 +1.25 0.978 49.5% +49 +44 — 52.6% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 16–10 (62%) — +0.96 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43
25 1993 1780 138.8 +0.23 +2.83 1.091 51.6% +2 -25 — 54.6% +0.25 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.39 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71
26 1994 1729 142.4 -2.33 +1.95 0.961 49.2% +8 +57 — 51.0% -0.09 12–13 (48%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.52 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94
27 1995 1615 133.1 -2.92 +0.69 0.900 47.9% +78 +30 — 38.8% -0.62 8–9 (47%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.42 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55
28 1996 1610 108.4 -1.35 -0.59 0.868 47.4% +67 — — 44.4% -0.78 — — — +0.30 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
Career — 1872 141.9 -1.43 +1.83 0.991 49.8% +19 -19 -163 51.8% +0.06 83–67 (55%) 98–77 (56%) 106.1 +0.97 — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.