H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Victor Pecci H2H: 1-0
Jaime Yzaga holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Pecci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-3 5-7 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jaime Yzaga | 6-3 5-7 7-5 7-5 | Victor Pecci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Victor Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Victor Pecci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 |