H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 0-1

Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 1–0 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1996 Italian Open round of 64 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Gaudenzi #48 7-5 6-1 Jakob Hlasek #47 Match data May 15, 1996* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's and 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jakob Hlasek Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4%
26 1991 59/70 6.2 3.0 59.2% 76.4% 50.7% 62.0% 41.9% 65.7% 37.0% 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1%
27 1992 39/49 5.7 3.5 58.5% 73.5% 48.4% 61.2% 44.3% 62.8% 39.2% 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3%
28 1993 40/45 5.2 4.0 57.6% 74.3% 47.4% 58.3% 41.3% 62.8% 36.3% 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0%
29 1994 38/46 5.2 4.3 59.0% 72.7% 49.9% 54.1% 49.7% 63.2% 35.8% 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8%
30 1995 49/59 6.3 3.6 59.4% 73.4% 47.6% 59.9% 37.5% 63.3% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 38/47 6.7 3.0 59.8% 74.5% 49.3% 53.3% 39.6% 64.1% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 263/695 5.9 3.5 58.9% 74.3% 48.9% 58.5% 42.1% 63.8% 36.7% — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
17 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18
18 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33
20 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78
21 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04
22 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03
23 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16
24 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21
25 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.