H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 0-1
Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 1–0 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1996 Rome Masters second round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1996* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 7-5 6-1 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Andrea Gaudenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |