H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Andreas Maurer H2H: 2-0
Jakob Hlasek holds a 2–0 lead over Andreas Maurer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1987 Wimbledon second round 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1985* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 7-6 7-6 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Andreas Maurer | #1,008 | #24 | 12 | 1,821 | 114 | 138 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Andreas Maurer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #65 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #384 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |