H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Andres Gomez H2H: 1-2

Andres Gomez holds a 2–1 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1989 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jakob Hlasek #8 6-4 6-2 6-2 Andres Gomez #29 Match data Jun 2, 1989* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Andres Gomez #11 7-5 6-1 Jakob Hlasek #24 Match data Apr 24, 1987* R16 Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #21 4-6 6-3 7-5 Jakob Hlasek #40 Match data Nov 23, 1985* SF Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Andres Gomez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21
32 — — — — — — — 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21
33 — — — — — — — 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek Andres Gomez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6%
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's and 66/69 of Andres Gomez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jakob Hlasek Andres Gomez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 59/70 6.2 3.0 59.2% 76.4% 50.7% 62.0% 41.9% 65.7% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 39/49 5.7 3.5 58.5% 73.5% 48.4% 61.2% 44.3% 62.8% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 40/45 5.2 4.0 57.6% 74.3% 47.4% 58.3% 41.3% 62.8% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 38/46 5.2 4.3 59.0% 72.7% 49.9% 54.1% 49.7% 63.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 49/59 6.3 3.6 59.4% 73.4% 47.6% 59.9% 37.5% 63.3% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 38/47 6.7 3.0 59.8% 74.5% 49.3% 53.3% 39.6% 64.1% 34.1% 1991 37/39 5.7 2.9 56.6% 73.4% 50.8% 57.1% 46.8% 63.5% 39.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 22/22 5.8 3.9 54.4% 71.8% 47.2% 64.5% 40.1% 60.5% 38.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 7/8 5.4 3.7 58.5% 63.7% 44.0% 57.7% 45.5% 55.5% 40.7%
Career — 263/695 5.9 3.5 58.9% 74.3% 48.9% 58.5% 42.1% 63.8% 36.7% — 66/763 5.7 3.3 56.1% 71.8% 48.9% 59.6% 44.4% 61.6% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek Andres Gomez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20
20 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09
21 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54
22 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90
23 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48
24 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36
25 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27
Career — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.