H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 1-2
Arnaud Boetsch holds a 2–1 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Boetsch leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1995 New Haven third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1995* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-2 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1993* | Lyon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 7-6(5) 5-7 7-5 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1993* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Arnaud Boetsch | 7-5 6-3 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Arnaud Boetsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |