H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 3-2

Jakob Hlasek holds a 3–2 lead over Carl Uwe Steeb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jakob Hlasek leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1992 Moscow semifinal 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Carl Uwe Steeb
GER Age 59 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carl Uwe Steeb #35 7-6(3) 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #39 Match data Nov 14, 1992* SF Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Jakob Hlasek #20 6-3 6-3 Carl Uwe Steeb #35 Match data Jan 9, 1992* R32 Sydney International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jakob Hlasek #18 7-6(8) 6-3 Carl Uwe Steeb #47 Match data Sep 27, 1991* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jakob Hlasek #43 5-7 6-1 6-3 Carl Uwe Steeb #46 Match data Jul 7, 1988* R32 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Carl Uwe Steeb #41 3-6 7-6 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #33 Match data May 6, 1988* R16 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Carl Uwe Steeb #1,355 #14 1,095 1,930 194 192 50.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Carl Uwe Steeb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1986 2–4 33.3% #150 1,499 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1987 10–8 55.6% #41 1,632 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0 1988 22–19 53.7% #73 1,726 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1989 34–15 69.4% #15 1,864 0 1
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0 1990 21–21 50.0% #46 1,714 0 1
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2 1991 27–27 50.0% #38 1,744 0 2
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1992 33–25 56.9% #29 1,791 0 2
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4 1993 18–20 47.4% #94 1,719 0 2
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5 1994 8–18 30.8% #89 1,608 0 2
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5 1995 12–16 42.9% #67 1,661 0 3
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1996 7–19 26.9% #179 1,540 0 3
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1988 12 7 19 63.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1989 10 5 15 66.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1990 10 8 18 55.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1991 5 6 11 45.5% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 11 12 8.3% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% — 65 59 124 52.4% 76 79 155 49.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 51 47 98 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's and 209/230 of Carl Uwe Steeb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jakob Hlasek Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 51/54 2.7 1.2 61.2% 67.6% 49.6% 48.1% 45.2% 60.5% 40.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 55/58 3.2 1.9 58.9% 67.9% 53.4% 64.4% 43.7% 61.9% 39.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 34/38 2.5 1.6 57.8% 66.3% 51.1% 55.0% 47.7% 59.7% 36.5%
26 1991 59/70 6.2 3.0 59.2% 76.4% 50.7% 62.0% 41.9% 65.7% 37.0% 1994 23/26 2.7 1.8 56.9% 65.4% 49.3% 60.7% 43.5% 58.5% 36.6%
27 1992 39/49 5.7 3.5 58.5% 73.5% 48.4% 61.2% 44.3% 62.8% 39.2% 1995 23/28 2.3 2.5 59.8% 65.0% 47.9% 52.5% 33.5% 57.9% 34.4%
28 1993 40/45 5.2 4.0 57.6% 74.3% 47.4% 58.3% 41.3% 62.8% 36.3% 1996 23/26 2.7 1.9 59.2% 64.9% 49.9% 49.5% 47.6% 58.7% 33.2%
29 1994 38/46 5.2 4.3 59.0% 72.7% 49.9% 54.1% 49.7% 63.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 49/59 6.3 3.6 59.4% 73.4% 47.6% 59.9% 37.5% 63.3% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 38/47 6.7 3.0 59.8% 74.5% 49.3% 53.3% 39.6% 64.1% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 263/695 5.9 3.5 58.9% 74.3% 48.9% 58.5% 42.1% 63.8% 36.7% — 209/386 2.8 1.7 59.2% 66.6% 50.7% 55.5% 44.0% 60.1% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.84 1986 1500 106.6 — — — — — +53 — 38.5% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.42
19 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.04 1987 1632 137.8 — — — — — +51 — 56.8% +0.68 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.23
20 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.17 1988 1727 139.0 — — — — +24 -102 — 50.9% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.36
21 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) — +0.10 1989 1864 154.0 — — — — -24 -14 — 64.5% +0.98 10–6 (63%) 5–4 (56%) — -3.00
22 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.72 1990 1714 147.4 — — — — +45 +75 — 50.5% 0.00 9–12 (43%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.11
23 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) — -1.83 1991 1745 142.9 -0.05 +1.22 1.026 50.4% -8 +21 — 51.1% +0.12 9–10 (47%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.15
24 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) — -0.85 1992 1792 145.3 +1.00 +1.59 1.033 50.7% -24 0 — 56.7% +0.47 11–8 (58%) 12–14 (46%) — -1.66
25 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.05 1993 1720 139.0 -0.63 -0.51 0.908 48.4% -7 +55 -191 48.3% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.90
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — -0.58 1994 1608 124.8 -1.75 -2.12 0.882 47.6% +102 -18 — 34.5% -0.81 3–6 (33%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.49
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) — -1.64 1995 1661 130.9 -2.93 -2.02 0.819 46.2% +75 -78 — 41.2% -0.78 6–3 (67%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.48
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.57 1996 1541 120.5 -2.41 -2.73 0.804 46.4% +38 +14 — 34.9% -1.25 2–6 (25%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.46
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) — -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 — 1931 147.2 -0.63 -0.12 0.942 48.9% +17 +3 -191 50.9% +0.04 68–66 (51%) 57–60 (49%) 99.0 -2.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.